Other Interests: Archery...
- Crna Legija
- First Sergeant 2
- Posts: 2333
- Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 5:14 am
- Location: australia
i got a 65 pound bow at the market for 5 bucks its fiber glass recurve it had no string or arrows but fun to shoot i use it to get rope over to tops of trees
'' To alcohol... The cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems.”
--Homer Simpson
Add me on ps3: wannafuk, 8/11/11 cant wait
--Homer Simpson
Add me on ps3: wannafuk, 8/11/11 cant wait
- TwitchTheAussie
- Corporal 5
- Posts: 980
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 3:23 am
55lbs worth of fibreglass compound. Forgot the brand and it uses a non-lock cam system. The poundage increases with draw length so my friend gets about 75+. I've been shooting since 13. God bless high school
Raise your horns if you love metal.
CpTn_lAw
-spudgunning is like sex, once you've tasted, you can't wait til next time.
CpTn_lAw
- inonickname
- First Sergeant 4
- Posts: 2606
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 3:27 am
Yes, I'm kicking up an old thread. Why? So I don't have to make a new one.
Does anyone have experience with PSE's bows? I'm currently looking at the stinger, brute and bow madness XS as I need a new bow.
2011 Stinger + sight + drop away rest + stab/sling + d loop installed: $350
2011 Brute + sight + drop away rest + stab/sling + d loop installed: $450
2011 Bow Madness + sight + drop away rest + stab/sling + d loop installed: $550
Any opinions on these bows/setups? thanks
Does anyone have experience with PSE's bows? I'm currently looking at the stinger, brute and bow madness XS as I need a new bow.
2011 Stinger + sight + drop away rest + stab/sling + d loop installed: $350
2011 Brute + sight + drop away rest + stab/sling + d loop installed: $450
2011 Bow Madness + sight + drop away rest + stab/sling + d loop installed: $550
Any opinions on these bows/setups? thanks
PimpAssasinG wrote:no im strong but you are a fat gay mother sucker that gets raped by black man for fun
Well I can't help you with said bows, though I'm glad you kicked this topic, perhaps a local archery club could help. Though I think you are in an area which wouldn't have one in a reasonable distance.
I can however post the bow I have http://cgi.ebay.com/Darton-SL50-Compoun ... 3f08981810.
It's around the 50# 55#, not 40# like the advert says.
The cheapest arrows I can get are $11, it doesn't really help that I'm not well funded. Any recommendations for backstops? I've been thinking about a lot of cardboard.
I can however post the bow I have http://cgi.ebay.com/Darton-SL50-Compoun ... 3f08981810.
It's around the 50# 55#, not 40# like the advert says.
The cheapest arrows I can get are $11, it doesn't really help that I'm not well funded. Any recommendations for backstops? I've been thinking about a lot of cardboard.
/sarcasm, /hyperbole
@ Zeus
You might try a hay bale, it has worked well for me. You don't have to worry bringing it in for rain and it will be very easy to pull out arrows. ( If using square ones, make sure to have two because they will stick out the back if just one)
You might try a hay bale, it has worked well for me. You don't have to worry bringing it in for rain and it will be very easy to pull out arrows. ( If using square ones, make sure to have two because they will stick out the back if just one)
- inonickname
- First Sergeant 4
- Posts: 2606
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 3:27 am
The archery club I shoot at uses roughly 4" of corrugated cardboard bolted together with the plastic target face over it. A light bow will barely shoot far into it, but with my 60# compound I've punched up to the fletchings a few times. When I get a new bow that will be 10# heavier with an ibo nearly 60 fps faster a few will probably end up through the target.
You can also get compressed cardboard bales from a rubbish tip. A hay bale works well for lighter bows. A heavy bag packed with rags also works apparently.
Here's the bow I'm probably upgrading to, the PSE bow madness XS:
70# draw, beyond parallel limbs, only 28.5" axle to axle (for reference, a longbow will sit a bit below 80 inches), 3lb 7 oz, 80% let off, 27-30 inch draw adjustment w/o press, stab, drop away rest, fiber optic sight, bowsling etc. It's a beast
You can also get compressed cardboard bales from a rubbish tip. A hay bale works well for lighter bows. A heavy bag packed with rags also works apparently.
Here's the bow I'm probably upgrading to, the PSE bow madness XS:
70# draw, beyond parallel limbs, only 28.5" axle to axle (for reference, a longbow will sit a bit below 80 inches), 3lb 7 oz, 80% let off, 27-30 inch draw adjustment w/o press, stab, drop away rest, fiber optic sight, bowsling etc. It's a beast
PimpAssasinG wrote:no im strong but you are a fat gay mother sucker that gets raped by black man for fun
- inonickname
- First Sergeant 4
- Posts: 2606
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 3:27 am
Decided to eventually go with the larger PSE Brute. At 70# with a 415 grain arrow it recorded ~295 feet per second, or 80 foot pounds of energy or nearly 110 joules . 66 foot pounds is considered enough to hunt big game such as Grizzly bears and Cape Buffalo. Well it's been papertuned by the shop over in the USA, just got to wait the 5-10 working days for it to get here down under by USPS now.
I liked the feel of the smaller Bow Madness XS but the stock strings are well known for taking a dump and needing costly replacements. That would have put the bow out of my price range. Not that the Brute is bad at all...parrallel limbs, 320 fps IBO, goes out to my ~30" draw, nice big 7" brace height and so on. The 2011 model has gotten an upgrade to the HP cam, plus with things like the slimline grip, backstop etc. it's a nice bow.
I just ran some numbers, and I'm probably roughly more than doubling the energy of my last bow, or a 45 foot pound increase
I liked the feel of the smaller Bow Madness XS but the stock strings are well known for taking a dump and needing costly replacements. That would have put the bow out of my price range. Not that the Brute is bad at all...parrallel limbs, 320 fps IBO, goes out to my ~30" draw, nice big 7" brace height and so on. The 2011 model has gotten an upgrade to the HP cam, plus with things like the slimline grip, backstop etc. it's a nice bow.
I just ran some numbers, and I'm probably roughly more than doubling the energy of my last bow, or a 45 foot pound increase
PimpAssasinG wrote:no im strong but you are a fat gay mother sucker that gets raped by black man for fun
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26203
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 569 times
- Been thanked: 343 times
Impressive
What makes this the case is that while velocity might be much lower than a bullet, the 415 grain arrow is over 10 times heavier than a standard 0.22" rimfire bullet without being much wider, and so it loses velocity at a significantly lower rate.
I think this hammers home the importance of sectional density and ties in nicely with what we were discussing in the "long range" thread. You wouldn't think of facing a buffalo with a 70-80 ft/lbs firearm or airgun (unless you're incredibly lucky) , but with a bow it's feasible.inonickname wrote:66 foot pounds is considered enough to hunt big game such as Grizzly bears and Cape Buffalo.
What makes this the case is that while velocity might be much lower than a bullet, the 415 grain arrow is over 10 times heavier than a standard 0.22" rimfire bullet without being much wider, and so it loses velocity at a significantly lower rate.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
- POLAND_SPUD
- Captain
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 4:43 pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
which is why I think we need cheap and simple to produce ammo.... make it as heavy as you can and you've got a nice long range range round
Seriously I don't think that the round created by LeMaudit will get very popular...
not that it sucks... it's great but it isn't practical - I wouldn't spend X $ to get it machined..
I want something that can go relatively far, requires little work and is cheap
not to be a dick but I think I am pretty good at telling what is practical and what is not... and I've got to tell you that machined rounds are very not practical
Seriously I don't think that the round created by LeMaudit will get very popular...
not that it sucks... it's great but it isn't practical - I wouldn't spend X $ to get it machined..
I want something that can go relatively far, requires little work and is cheap
not to be a dick but I think I am pretty good at telling what is practical and what is not... and I've got to tell you that machined rounds are very not practical
Children are the future
unless we stop them now
unless we stop them now
-
- Private 2
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 6:22 am
- Location: Bruxelles, Belgium
You also have to consider the fact that only broadheads are used in bowhunting. A decent bow shooting a broadhead will make a lot of damage, huge external wounds compared to a firearm wound, and this is why bowhunted animals usually bleed to death instead of dying instantaneously.
I personally have a 70 pound compound and I have found that 2 standard targets (one hay,one foam) stop the arrow nicely.
I personally have a 70 pound compound and I have found that 2 standard targets (one hay,one foam) stop the arrow nicely.
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26203
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 569 times
- Been thanked: 343 times
Perhaps not a machined round, but it could be used as a master to cast other rounds - I know it can be donePOLAND_SPUD wrote:Seriously I don't think that the round created by LeMaudit will get very popular...
not that it sucks... it's great but it isn't practical - I wouldn't spend X $ to get it machined..
I want something that can go relatively far, requires little work and is cheap.
Fair point, in many ways an arrow injures more like a knife than a bullet.daniele tn wrote:You also have to consider the fact that only broadheads are used in bowhunting.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
- inonickname
- First Sergeant 4
- Posts: 2606
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 3:27 am
Depends. If you have rage broadheads it's like having a sword shot through you.jackssmirkingrevenge wrote:Perhaps not a machined round, but it could be used as a master to cast other rounds - I know it can be donePOLAND_SPUD wrote:Seriously I don't think that the round created by LeMaudit will get very popular...
not that it sucks... it's great but it isn't practical - I wouldn't spend X $ to get it machined..
I want something that can go relatively far, requires little work and is cheap.
Fair point, in many ways an arrow injures more like a knife than a bullet.daniele tn wrote:You also have to consider the fact that only broadheads are used in bowhunting.
[youtube][/youtube]
It's not just an external would a broadhead will make. It will leave a massive entry and exit (up to 2" plus) but will do massive damage to veins etc. Any vital organs that are hit such as the heart, lungs etc. will be torn to pieces by a broadhead. Penetration is pretty massive too, with passthroughs (i.e. arrow goes in one side and comes completely out on the other) fairly common on reasonably large game.
Todays more powerful bows are also used for hunting big big game- i.e. elephants, rhinos, cape buffalo etc. An 80# omen can put out 130+ foot pounds of energy which is sufficient for taking anything which lives on land. Hunting elephants with rifles tends to start at 5000+ foot pounds, or 40 times more powerful. Some larger cartridges might run 80 to 100 times more powerful than the bow. Says a lot for arrows.
PimpAssasinG wrote:no im strong but you are a fat gay mother sucker that gets raped by black man for fun
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26203
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 569 times
- Been thanked: 343 times
Some seem to argue that these "mechanicals" might perform well against ballistic gelatin but do not perform as well when bone is involved. Any experience with them?inonickname wrote:Depends. If you have rage broadheads it's like having a sword shot through you.
Bloody right, this is friggin' unbelievable! That's amazing!Todays more powerful bows are also used for hunting big big game- i.e. elephants, rhinos, cape buffalo etc. An 80# omen can put out 130+ foot pounds of energy which is sufficient for taking anything which lives on land. Hunting elephants with rifles tends to start at 5000+ foot pounds, or 40 times more powerful. Some larger cartridges might run 80 to 100 times more powerful than the bow. Says a lot for arrows.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life