Punkin Chunkin 2010 Mythbusters Episode
Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 10:58 pm
Is anyone here going to watch this show tonight? Or, has anyone watched it, already? Comes on in 3 minutes, for me!
Earth's largest potato gun resource
https://www.spudfiles.com/
As far as construction is concerned, I found this link :clemsonguy1125 wrote:I watched it at 11 on discovery, missed air cannon round one though. I wonder what type of valve they used. I assume it was a slow opening valve so they would not make pumpkin pie. Maybe a large butterfly valve or diaphram valve.
A burst disk could be simpler to implement, and allow them to achieve the same performance with much less pressure (because unlike the butterfly valve, you have almost instant full flow with virtually zero opening time) and reduce the chances of the pumpkin being destroyed.omniscient wrote:This cannon does, in fact, use a butterfly valve.
I don't think anything at the muzzle would help, the pumpkin is usually destroyed by the "impact" of the air burst and sudden acceleration, it would be "pumpkin pie" long before it reached the muzzle.I've watched this show and now wonder if a ported muzzle and even a muzzle brake would help to eliminate the chance of the pumpkin grenading as it exited the barrel. (What they refer to as "pumpkin pie")
...Good point about the about the impact of the air burst and sudden acceleration.jackssmirkingrevenge wrote:A burst disk could be simpler to implement, and allow them to achieve the same performance with much less pressure (because unlike the butterfly valve, you have almost instant full flow with virtually zero opening time) and reduce the chances of the pumpkin being destroyed.omniscient wrote:This cannon does, in fact, use a butterfly valve.
I don't think anything at the muzzle would help, the pumpkin is usually destroyed by the "impact" of the air burst and sudden acceleration, it would be "pumpkin pie" long before it reached the muzzle.I've watched this show and now wonder if a ported muzzle and even a muzzle brake would help to eliminate the chance of the pumpkin grenading as it exited the barrel. (What they refer to as "pumpkin pie")
used at the same pressure, of course the burst disk would be more than likely to shatter the pumpkin - but the point is that since you have a much more efficient valve, you can do more with less. I wouldn't think the burst disk fragments would be particularly damaging.omniscient wrote:The idea of a burst disc, though... even one that remains in a fixed position and scored to split open... wouldn't there be some tiny fragments of material that would blast into the center of the pumpkin, as well as the sudden and violent rush of air direct right into the center of the barrel, would probably be much more likely to grenade the pumpkin?
How would freezing the pumpkin increase its density, unless you filled it with water first? If anything, ice is less dense than waterToo bad that they probably would not allow the pumpkins to be frozen, thus increasing the density of it's center mass? IIRC, they do not allow any type of wadding. You would think that a 5-foot long foam plug would work great and finally allow one to break the 1-mile mark?
1. All pumpkins fired must remain intact until they impact the ground to obtain an official measurement.
2. No part of the machine shall cross the firing line.
3. No Wadding (including bean chaff, straw, foam, metal, or any other object.)
4. No explosives are allowed.
I'd just be concerned about actually managing to catch the piston at the end of travel... the forces on it must be huge.jackssmirkingrevenge wrote:But technically a captive piston is not wadding, it's an air powered catapult... of sorts... hmmm...
The reason I think a slow valve at higher pressure is better than a fast valve at lower pressure is the lack of a pressure gradient as the pumpkin travels down the barrel.jackssmirkingrevenge wrote:used at the same pressure, of course the burst disk would be more than likely to shatter the pumpkin - but the point is that since you have a much more efficient valve, you can do more with less
Been done...saefroch wrote:I'd just be concerned about actually managing to catch the piston at the end of travel... the forces on it must be huge.