compact combustion

Boom! The classic potato gun harnesses the combustion of flammable vapor. Show us your combustion spud gun and discuss fuels, ratios, safety, ignition systems, tools, and more.

would this work?

yes
3
60%
no
0
No votes
what are you on and were can i get some
2
40%
 
Total votes: 5
User avatar
experament_u2
Specialist 2
Specialist 2
Posts: 271
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 5:04 am

Wed Dec 06, 2006 5:35 pm

After reading this post yesterday http://www.spudfiles.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=5070&
It got me thinking it would be pretty cool having a new kind of combustion
So after looking under my bed for bits i came up with these two simple designs....

click for clearer image
<img src="http://i139.photobucket.com/albums/q291 ... oxguns.jpg" alt="Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting">
User avatar
Bluetooth
Corporal 4
Corporal 4
Posts: 863
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 7:57 am

Wed Dec 06, 2006 5:44 pm

So pretty much co-ax combustions? Thats pretty cool. I was thinking about a co-ax hybrid but i don't plan on making it very soon or at all.
User avatar
FiveseveN
Specialist 3
Specialist 3
Posts: 337
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2005 5:48 am
Location: Nowhere
Contact:

Wed Dec 06, 2006 6:39 pm

Does anyone remember that little issue of DTD in long chambers? Plus, I don't think the geometry is ideal for a flame front. You'd need a longer barrel to use the smoother pressure peak efficiently anyway.
Also, I do believe the spark should be in the front. Makes more sense to have the flame travel "with the wind". Or maybe the geometry would actually speed up the combustion. This needs further investigation, for sure.
Like others said, why don't just use an over-under design?
User avatar
King_TaTer
Specialist 2
Specialist 2
Posts: 265
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 6:14 pm

Wed Dec 06, 2006 6:49 pm

well it looks pretty sweet. hope you make one . i have actually wondered why anyone hadnt even thought of it, hmm maybe no one said anyting lol.i dont see why it woudn't work its just like makin a air powered one with a piston or diaphram.
User avatar
sgort87
Corporal 5
Corporal 5
Posts: 994
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 10:32 am
Location: Lockport, Illinois

Donating Members

Wed Dec 06, 2006 7:20 pm

They suck. I've made one and getting the mix right is a royal pain.

And this design actually makes it more difficult to carry. It weighs a ton more.
User avatar
experament_u2
Specialist 2
Specialist 2
Posts: 271
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 5:04 am

Wed Dec 06, 2006 10:20 pm

I don’t think it would weigh that much and to fix the flame front crap just rig up a camera stun gun with dual ignition.

<img src="http://i139.photobucket.com/albums/q291 ... /stun1.jpg" alt="Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting">

(i know picture is a bit crap :( leave me alone)
User avatar
FiveseveN
Specialist 3
Specialist 3
Posts: 337
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2005 5:48 am
Location: Nowhere
Contact:

Wed Dec 06, 2006 11:19 pm

The "flame front crap" is the heart and soul of any combustion spudgun. It is not to be taken lightly.
If Gort says they suck, I tend to believe him.
User avatar
experament_u2
Specialist 2
Specialist 2
Posts: 271
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 5:04 am

Thu Dec 07, 2006 2:29 am

:( i know when i am beaten :(

oh well, back to the drawing bord

btw thanks for the advice and help
Post Reply