and the idea of a hybrid is to obtain high pressure (more than a pneumatic) and I doubt that will stem from 30-40psi in the chamber of any hybrid!

Like Seaking said, the big problem with a pressure relief valve (which is what burger posted) is that as soon as the pressure behind the ammo is the same as the pressure in the chamber the valve starts to close again.burgerace69 wrote:so im just curious, but why dont more people use pistons? it seems like a pretty decent idea (btw i have decided that the chamber be made of steel- everything else can be PVC, dont worry i wont kill myself now)
You could use a burst disk behind the piston. It wouldn't be great for reload time, but it would certainly cut down on foil consumption as opposed to a full-bore burst disk valve.You need some way to capture the piston (or diaphram or ...) in the open position.
Or a DFTV design like Galfisk used on his hybrid.DYI wrote:You could use a burst disk behind the piston. It wouldn't be great for reload time, but it would certainly cut down on foil consumption as opposed to a full-bore burst disk valve.You need some way to capture the piston (or diaphram or ...) in the open position.
Think of it as assisted natural selection - By helping this guy (and countless other n00bs) build a dangerous device that he doesn't understand, we're actually doing good for the race as a whole.(I wonder why we spoon feed this guy how to build the most dangerous gun we can think of)
Bad side: bad stories about spudguns. People will remind him of "he built a spudgun with help from spudfiles.com and now he is dead."DYI wrote:Think of it as assisted natural selection - By helping this guy (and countless other n00bs) build a dangerous device that he doesn't understand, we're actually doing good for the race as a whole.