that is also a large possibility i just have to find somewhere thats sells cheep lighters with them, havent seen those disposable one around yetInsomniac wrote:Perhaps your particular piezo is just too shizenhousen to get the job done?

that is also a large possibility i just have to find somewhere thats sells cheep lighters with them, havent seen those disposable one around yetInsomniac wrote:Perhaps your particular piezo is just too shizenhousen to get the job done?
I noticed the same with my combustions, a 6mm gap gave me reliable ignition while a 3mm gap gave no ignition at all, with a piezo. If I'm not mistaken it's about the spark arcing across a certain amount of fuel/air molecules, and by pressurising the mix in a hybrid you're increasing the density and therefore reducing the distance the spark needs to arc.Fnord wrote:I have noticed that very small gaps tend to be unreliable for standard combustions. My hybrid refused to fire a 1x mix even when the ratio was perfect. The small gap only worked with pressurized fuel/air.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
You're right... they are funky looking!jackssmirkingrevenge wrote:Some more experimentation, this time to see how much your average (though extremely funky looking, these are the best designed ones we're ever had) laboratory safety glasses would protect you in the event of being shot in the face by a hybrid
![]()
I'm fairly certain that if it were rigidly supported without a hard backing, the pellet would have made it through with ease. The CO<sub>2</sub> capsule has a lot more kinetic energy but it doesn't have the benefit of velocity, meaning it would still bludgeon its way through as opposed to punching a clean hole.Insomniac wrote:I wonder how they'd react if they weren't allowed to move...
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
No consolation for poor Marvinthenilovefire wrote:well i guess all that proves is that safety glasses arnt made for the people with an intention of shooting themselves in the face
Could you test something more like what I wear? It'd be interesting to see if that's really worth all the extra money
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
i didn't bother to take a photo of the brick because all that happend to it was it got a shiny metallic stain which was disappointing, but if you still want me to im sure i can make that happen and as for safety it had three sides surrounded by wood and for the front i had a newspaper to slow or stop shrapnel but did not effect the entry, i was wearing sunglasses but i know they wouldn't do anything so i looked in the other direction, and it is actually pretty good when i comes to sound because of the very low chamber to barrel ratio its pretty quiet i mean its not silent but its not badjackssmirkingrevenge wrote:Fragmentation win! Any photos of the brickand also, since you were shooting at a hard target, I hope you were wearing safety glasses!
How loud is it at 27x?
Hardly surprising given the frangible nature of the projectile, did you get lead fragments embedded in the wood?ilovefire wrote:i didn't bother to take a photo of the brick because all that happend to it was it got a shiny metallic stain which was disappointing
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life