Thinking about making a piston cartridge, but at smaller sizes the coaxial layout doesn't end up leaving much chamber volume, so I came up with this. Actually very similar to JSR's pneumatic cartridge now that I think about it.
I'm concerned the sealing face might end up melting. I couldn't find anything on that in other threads, so I'm assuming it's not an issue?
Also, would the gap around the sealing face restrict flow too much?
Piston cartridge
You're going to need one hellacious spring back there to hold your prefire mix. I don't think you would have to worry about melting sealing faces, at least at sane hybrid mixes. I believe it has been recommended by _fnord to use air pressure back there instead of trying to calibrate a spring to do the job.
You show igition wires but no gap detail...are you still dreaming that up?
You show igition wires but no gap detail...are you still dreaming that up?
How I imagined it was the piston being essentially a thick epoxy washer, isolating the center part from the chamber. The thin vertical line in the middle is a piece of wire which makes the spark gap(s) between itself and the chamber wall.
The part at the back is a check valve for filling, the spring is just there to hold it in place and allow the current to flow through the center.
You wouldn't need a spring to hold the prefire mix, the pressure seals it. Unless I'm missing something..
And because the back is sealed, it should act as an air spring. Though I'm not sure how the timing would work out if that part ignited as well. It may seal the barrel back up before the projectile has cleared the barrel.
The part at the back is a check valve for filling, the spring is just there to hold it in place and allow the current to flow through the center.
You wouldn't need a spring to hold the prefire mix, the pressure seals it. Unless I'm missing something..
And because the back is sealed, it should act as an air spring. Though I'm not sure how the timing would work out if that part ignited as well. It may seal the barrel back up before the projectile has cleared the barrel.
- ALIHISGREAT
- Staff Sergeant 3
- Posts: 1778
- Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2007 6:47 pm
- Location: UK
you could potentially get ignition in the spring chamber at the back if you fill through it, you'll need another method of fuelling for this to work, maybe a check valve/schrader either through the chamber wall or on the piston front or something.
<a href="http://www.bungie.net/stats/halo3/defau ... player=ALI H IS GREAT"><img src="http://www.bungie.net/card/halo3/ALI H IS GREAT.ashx"></a>


- Fnord
- First Sergeant 2
- Posts: 2239
- Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:20 pm
- Location: Pripyat
- Been thanked: 1 time
- Contact:
A cartridge design is one of the few I'd suggest using burst disks with.
Imo getting ONE piston hybrid working right was hard enough. Mass producing them will be ridiculously annoying.
Simpler:
Union(B-disk) -> reducer -> chamber pipe -> endcap with hole drilled -> schrader.
Put the schrader through the endcap with the rubber still on it, and use it as one half of the spark gap circuit.
The other half will be the chamber wall.
*****
Your sealing face won't melt.
You don't want to cut flow down more than about 2/3 your barrel bore area; it'll reduce performance if you do.
Imo getting ONE piston hybrid working right was hard enough. Mass producing them will be ridiculously annoying.
Simpler:
Union(B-disk) -> reducer -> chamber pipe -> endcap with hole drilled -> schrader.
Put the schrader through the endcap with the rubber still on it, and use it as one half of the spark gap circuit.
The other half will be the chamber wall.
*****
Your sealing face won't melt.
You don't want to cut flow down more than about 2/3 your barrel bore area; it'll reduce performance if you do.

Well the piston front could act as a check valve to fuel through, then orings on the piston to seal it from air behind.
Hate to let go of an idea, but fnord makes a good point. The effort might be better spent finding a way to simplify and speed up burst disk production/installation, like a punch or something.
Hate to let go of an idea, but fnord makes a good point. The effort might be better spent finding a way to simplify and speed up burst disk production/installation, like a punch or something.