I got sick of waiting for it to charge, and because I dismantled the capacitor bank so I had access to the individual caps, I did a few more shots with just the single 160uf cap. While it isn't quite as loud now, it is much more convenient. Faster charges, and I can simply hold the cap so that the bit between the leads is in contact with the black heatshrink on the gun, and by moving the cap backwards it comes in contact with the V shaped legs of the gun. This makes it easy to fire without fiddling around trying to make both leads touch. Because of that, I did a bit of shooting in the dark
Damn I love long exposure photos:
This first one was a blank shot with no ammo, with a super super short barrel to direct the sparks a bit:

These next two are real shots. The first one had a loose spitball that didn't fire very fast, and just bounced off the target. The second shot was much better and fired with such insane velocity it actually managed to stick to the plastic container I was firing at

Still nowhere near as powerful as a mini combustion, but oh well. Makes for nice photos:


Another blank shot, this time with the 'real' barrel. Note the small cloud of plasma coming out the front (or is it just glare in the camera lens?):

These two were fired with no barrel, so I could see the pretty sparks

It's strange, in both photos (epsecially the first), there is at least one spark that completely changes it's direction in midair and comes back towards the gun. It's amazing how perfect the one on the first pic looks (it's the spark furthest to the right I'm talking about) I wonder why this happens??? Other sparks, like from where the capacitor touches the leads, the sparks either fade or break apart. Aluminium sparks seem to be different.


Now for the important question:
What looks better? The green barrel in these pics, or the original orange one?