Gatling gun
- stuffbuilder
- Private 4
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2011 8:56 pm
I had an idea for a rapid-fire Gatling gun. It would need a sealed rotating joint and a check valve for each chamber/barrel assembly (there would be a chamber for each barrel). In all there would probably be 6 separate barrels/chambers, each electronically controlled. One of the biggest problems would be the cost. A single 1/2 inch rotating fitting costs well over $100 on McMaster, and all those solenoids would definitely add up. Another big problem would be finding a compressor big enough to supply the thing with enough air to charge all 6 chambers. I'm sure even a 1 inch gun would need a huge amount of air.
- Mr.Tallahassee
- Specialist 3
- Posts: 364
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 2:35 am
I believe this would be something to post in the pneumatic discussion, not here. If that is the case for sure, Mods, please move.
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26204
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 572 times
- Been thanked: 345 times
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
- Technician1002
- Captain
- Posts: 5189
- Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 11:10 am
Depending on your needs a rotating joint does not need to be expensive.
Google air hose swivel connector. Top hits are under $10.
Google air hose swivel connector. Top hits are under $10.
- stuffbuilder
- Private 4
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2011 8:56 pm
I'm new here, and as of now this thing is purely hypothetical. It probably won't be build, at least not for a couple of years.
As for the swivel joint: the difference between that and a rotating joint is that a rotating joint is designed for continuous rotation while most of those swivel joints may only turn 360 degrees before being stopped.
As for the swivel joint: the difference between that and a rotating joint is that a rotating joint is designed for continuous rotation while most of those swivel joints may only turn 360 degrees before being stopped.
- velocity3x
- Corporal 4
- Posts: 828
- Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 3:09 pm
- Location: Yuma, Arizona
- Contact:
I can assure you that there are much BIGGER problems such as design, engineering and manufacturing.... just to name a few.stuffbuilder wrote: One of the biggest problems would be the cost.
-
- Specialist 4
- Posts: 458
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 12:31 pm
- Contact:
these swivel !
They also leak like sieve and pop off unless you use a hose clamp!Goats spudz wrote:these swivel !
-
- Specialist 4
- Posts: 458
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 12:31 pm
- Contact:
if you use a small airline pipe it wont leak and will swivel, you have to heat the pipe in boiling water the pipe to get it on http://www.airlines-pneumatics.co.uk/we ... =S08000105
- stuffbuilder
- Private 4
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2011 8:56 pm
I've got most of the design/engineering worked out. The problem with that design is that it requires expensive parts like a continuous rotating joint and multiple solenoids. And by "requires" I mean I can't find an acceptable alternative. I don't have any sketches but I can make some and post them here. I'm not sure of your definition of "manufacturing," but mine is along the lines of inexpensive production of a lot of an item. This gun, as with most spud guns, would be built in a garage with with a minimal amount of tools and custom parts.there are much BIGGER problems such as design, engineering and manufacturing
Here is a true rotary union representation, for those that may not understand.
- Attachments
-
- 68996187gif_00000044846.jpg (7.54 KiB) Viewed 4354 times
- velocity3x
- Corporal 4
- Posts: 828
- Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 3:09 pm
- Location: Yuma, Arizona
- Contact:
Well.... At times I do overcomplicate things.stuffbuilder wrote:This gun, as with most spud guns, would be built in a garage with with a minimal amount of tools and custom parts.
- jimmy101
- Sergeant Major
- Posts: 3199
- Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 9:48 am
- Location: Greenwood, Indiana
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 17 times
- Contact:
Dewey's solution looks promising. Tech's has the problem that though the fitting is designed to swivel it probably isn't designed to do thousands of full rotations, which presumably a Gatling gun design would require.
Perhaps use a mod of Dewey's and Tech's suggestion: just use a compressed air quick connect.
(from Harbor Freight)
These will spin (but not really swivel), they are cheap, and if after a couple thousand revolutions they start to wear you can just replace them for a couple bucks.
Perhaps use a mod of Dewey's and Tech's suggestion: just use a compressed air quick connect.
(from Harbor Freight)
These will spin (but not really swivel), they are cheap, and if after a couple thousand revolutions they start to wear you can just replace them for a couple bucks.
- stuffbuilder
- Private 4
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2011 8:56 pm
I thought about just letting a quick connect rotate, but nearly every time I've seen them rotate I've heard air leak out. With something like this that requires a huge amount of air, I want the connection to be as efficient as possible.
Jimmy;
You beat me to it!
I was going to suggest the same thing as a "pseudo-rotating coupler".
Put some grease on the male coupler detent and probably good to go!
You beat me to it!
I was going to suggest the same thing as a "pseudo-rotating coupler".
Put some grease on the male coupler detent and probably good to go!