Hi,
Alright first post here.
If this post is not right place I apologize. So I am planning on building a cannon for a physics final project utilizing a 2.5" Mecair VEM220 Dust Collector diaphragm valve and a 2.5" barrel for tennis balls.
I found the Mecair valve after many hours of searching when I wasn't able to get a Supah Valve but this seems like it might be a better option anyway. I haven't found a lot of info about this type of valve for spud guns.
Here is the valve: http://www.gekko-inc.com/store/diaphrag ... em220.html
And some info about the Mecair 200 series:
http://www.cleanairsystems.com/attachme ... Series.pdf
My questions:
1) Is this definitely my best option? Or are their other plug and play piston valves or a different brand or model of Dust Collector valve that would be better or cheaper?
2) How should I pilot the valve? Its already a double diaphragm valve (smaller diaphragm pilots primary valve). On the info page above is says the VEM type valves have "Remote pneumatic connection" rather than an integrated solenoid.
Could I possible just drill and tap a blowgun into the secondary diaphragm valve? Or is there a better option?
2) What would you recommend for barrel and chamber sizes for best performance firing tennis balls?
Thank you very much for your time I would love to hear from anyone with experience with this type of project!
2.5" Dust valve cannon advice please.
For barrel im pretty dam sure sch40 2.5 inch (electrical conduit fits tennis balls perfectly:)
If its the same as a 1.5 inch dust collector you should be able to just put a ball valve ns quick connect right into the top part of the valve:)
If its the same as a 1.5 inch dust collector you should be able to just put a ball valve ns quick connect right into the top part of the valve:)
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26203
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 569 times
- Been thanked: 344 times
Could you tell us a bit about what you want to achieve with the project? Maximum performance, repeatability in terms of accuracy or range, semi-automatic fire?
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
Thanks everyone for the replies!
I don't really have the time right now to work on a semi-auto.
Also, I found that the Mecair VEM220 won't be available in my timeframe of a few weeks so I'll have to use the more expensive but higher performance Goyen RCA62T, but this shouldn't make any difference in the design.
Thanks again
I would prioritize power, repeatability, and accuracy. I really like the idea of being able to hit a target at a high angle of fire. I will be using this as my high school physics final project to study projectile motion among other relevant topics. I will be limited to 40 PSI for at-school use but the maximum working pressure of the valve is 125 so I would like to build the whole cannon to that spec.Could you tell us a bit about what you want to achieve with the project? Maximum performance, repeatability in terms of accuracy or range, semi-automatic fire?
I don't really have the time right now to work on a semi-auto.
Also, I found that the Mecair VEM220 won't be available in my timeframe of a few weeks so I'll have to use the more expensive but higher performance Goyen RCA62T, but this shouldn't make any difference in the design.
Thanks again
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26203
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 569 times
- Been thanked: 344 times
I would go for solenoid piloting, it's really the best way to ensure repeatable firing, along with an accurate chamber filling gauge.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
- Technician1002
- Captain
- Posts: 5189
- Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 11:10 am
Add a metering orifice and tube for dead space to your meter. The ~20mS discharge times on my cannon caused the needle to bend. Save your meter from rapid decompression.
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26203
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 569 times
- Been thanked: 344 times
... or simply put it after a ball valve that is closed before firingTechnician1002 wrote:Add a metering orifice and tube for dead space to your meter. The ~20mS discharge times on my cannon caused the needle to bend. Save your meter from rapid decompression.
One thing to remember is that a tennis ball is a very poor projectile. As a fuzzy sphere it has a relatively high drag coefficient:I really like the idea of being able to hit a target at a high angle of fire.
Also, since it's mostly air, it has very low density, along with the above means that it loses velocity fairly quickly. It is also very susceptible to environmental effects.
If you want to hit a target at high angles, you definitely need to be taking the wind into account, and mount the cannon in a way that allows precises angles of traverse and elevation to be measured and fixed.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
- Technician1002
- Captain
- Posts: 5189
- Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 11:10 am
When done right you can bounce a golf ball off the rim of a wheelbarrow.
Precise power control is essential for this.
[youtube][/youtube]
Precise power control is essential for this.
[youtube][/youtube]