Suppose you had two bb guns, one relying on the "cloud" method and the other the "vortex" method.
Their barrels, chambers and all those measurements are all the same, same dia, same length, thus same volume.
Would one of these use less air to acheive a higher ROF, higher FPS, and thus be more efficient with air usage.
Another thing, what is the optimum diameter of a barrel, one that strikes a balance, between less wastage of air and one this prevents jams and is large enoguh so that the BBs go through unhindered (I dont mean that the dia is smaller that the BB, I just mean there must be some sort of chance that dictates wether a BB goes into the barrel in its revolution around the vortex block, or as it bounces around the chamber in a cloud.
Thankeye greatlye.
Cloud and Vortex efficiency
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26203
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 569 times
- Been thanked: 344 times
Neither, they're both horribly inefficient.Would one of these use less air to acheive a higher ROF, higher FPS, and thus be more efficient with air usage.
As tight as you can find, as it will have a significant effect on performance. I had done an experiment back in the day on spudtech, using a true 0.177" barrel compared to a 0.196" barrel. The difference of a mere 0.019" translated into an average increase of 33% of muzzle energy.Another thing, what is the optimum diameter of a barrel, one that strikes a balance, between less wastage of air and one this prevents jams and is large enough so that the BBs go through unhindered
The hole from the vortex to the barrel doesn't make a difference to air wastage because the restriction of the barrel diameter remains the same.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
I would say that in general, the consensus is that a vortex design has higher ROF.Would one of these use less air to acheive a higher ROF, higher FPS, and thus be more efficient with air usage.
There is probably little in FPS to separate the designs on that criteria alone.
As to air efficiency, I would imagine the vortex came out on top.
Both will use a similar amount of air in the same time, but the vortex is likely to fire more BBs in that time, that would equate to a better efficiency.
Does that thing kinda look like a big cat to you?
- bigbob12345
- Staff Sergeant
- Posts: 1516
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 9:13 am
- Location: Mercer Island,Washington
The answer of that question seems obvious
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26203
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 569 times
- Been thanked: 344 times
In practice, the vast majority of BBs are of regular shape and size, the chances of a jam are minimal - you can always make a funnel and pass them to a piece of barrel material before use to eliminate defective BBs.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life