
That phrase accounts for about 37% of my Landrover usestarman wrote:...because I can!

That phrase accounts for about 37% of my Landrover usestarman wrote:...because I can!
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
Still, no doubt, you bought it with some idea in mind for what you were going to use it for. Surely you didn't buy an expensive night vision scope solely for the purpose of having one.*jackssmirkingrevenge wrote:Generally I would agree with you, but for example I have a night vision sight which I certainly have no actual need for, and only used once to try it out.
"Because I can" accounts for 85% of anything I do - but mostly because I don't want to explain why I'm actually doing it.jackssmirkingrevenge wrote:That phrase accounts for about 37% of my Landrover usestarman wrote:...because I can!
Novelty, mostly - and assuming you didn't buy it, the feeling that you built it yourself.Brian the brain wrote:I don't get how guys that can legally own firearms can still be so interested in spudguns.
Yeah, it's so they can shoot their own government if they start doing anything naughty.D_Hall wrote:You clearly do not understand the intent of the 2nd Amendment.
To me, spudguns are an academic excercise. The goal isn't so much to build a gun as it is to predict what that gun will do *IN ADVANCE*. It's all about proving that my knowledge of gun theory actually translates to the real world. A good result for GGDT is (to me) much more exciting than some video of a disintegrating target set to some gawd awful music.Brian the brain wrote:I don't get how guys that can legally own firearms can still be so interested in spudguns..
The 1911 just never caught my fancy. As I said in the first post, I've got a soft spot for foreign military firearms. You'll note that in the handgun category I have the Luger (duh) and the gun on the top (which most people may not recognize) is a Makarov (Russian Army service pistol for a very long time).Somehow I'm missing a 1911 in this collection.
now I know why there is no such law in Poland... They would be all already deadYeah, it's so they can shoot their own government if they start doing anything naughty
Well, only when the people doing the shooting are a minority and are removing a government which has the support of the majority of the electorate. There would for example certainly be a difference between trying to overthrow your current government when it was swept to power 12 years ago, and attempting to do the same nowRagnarok wrote:Although I should note, on the occasions the people HAVE tried to shoot their own government because they've done something naughty, this is taken as a bad thing.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
Legally owning real guns is just taken for granted is all...almost to the point of being boring..well not really.Brian the brain wrote:I don't get how guys that can legally own firearms can still be so interested in spudguns..
Some Korean craphi wrote:whats the one 10 rifles down, between the sks and the marlin 60?
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
This is the reason for the second amendment, if we didn't have it we would already be like Cuba. The second amendment is our safety net.Ragnarok wrote: Yeah, it's so they can shoot their own government if they start doing anything naughty.![]()
This is because they are mostly radical individuals who don't have the thought to organize themselves with other similar people, that and the fact that they lose makes them "the bad guys".Ragnarok wrote: Although I should note, on the occasions the people HAVE tried to shoot their own government because they've done something naughty, this is taken as a bad thing. :tongue3:
Politics. Gotta love'm.ThegunGuy wrote:This is the reason for the second amendment, if we didn't have it we would already be like Cuba. The second amendment is our safety net.Ragnarok wrote: Yeah, it's so they can shoot their own government if they start doing anything naughty.![]()
This is because they are mostly radical individuals who don't have the thought to organize themselves with other similar people, that and the fact that they lose makes them "the bad guys"...Ragnarok wrote: Although I should note, on the occasions the people HAVE tried to shoot their own government because they've done something naughty, this is taken as a bad thing. :tongue3: