Plans, have you seen these?
- zeigs spud
 - Corporal 2

 - Posts: 657
 - Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 10:39 pm
 
never seen that one before but i would never pa for plans such as those. i wouldn't pay for plans at all, they could be inperciese or just all toghether not working wihtout good machineary. 
(s.p. in all lol)
            
			
									
						(s.p. in all lol)
i personnally find pride in thinking up my own design for a cannon, buying plans just seems to lazy and a waste of time, especially since some plans call for speciaty parts which you can't find or get made, while if you think up a desighn you can change it to work with what evry parts you can get or got.
            
			
									
						- saladtossser
 - Sergeant 3

 - Posts: 1234
 - Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2005 10:40 am
 - Location: Toronto
 - Contact:
 
wow that guy lost a lot of customers because of just one of those pictures
anyone think they can pull it off? the person who makes it gets all the g-strings in my inventory
            
			
									
						anyone think they can pull it off? the person who makes it gets all the g-strings in my inventory
"whoa... I thought pimpmann was black..."-pyromanic13
						- zeigs spud
 - Corporal 2

 - Posts: 657
 - Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 10:39 pm
 
how many those you got? :angel12:saladtossser wrote:wow that guy lost a lot of customers because of just one of those pictures
anyone think they can pull it off? the person who makes it gets all the g-strings in my inventory
I made a private design a while back something like that except pneumatic.
Decided it was a waste of time for any advantages it might have, 6 relatively fast shots < 1 good one. Not to mention the bugger getting the spring loaded sections to clamp the revolving magazine to work would have been.
Went for a compact single shot instead.
            
			
									
						Decided it was a waste of time for any advantages it might have, 6 relatively fast shots < 1 good one. Not to mention the bugger getting the spring loaded sections to clamp the revolving magazine to work would have been.
Went for a compact single shot instead.
- experament-u2
 - Specialist 4

 - Posts: 469
 - Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2006 11:18 pm
 
i agree with killjoy designing and building a gun different to everyone elses gun is so much more rewarding and alot funna 
            
			
									
						With a gun that complex you would probably spend 99% of your time troubleshooting, and 1% of the time actually shooting.
Oh, and six shots in a row means you need to reload the gun 6 times before you shoot it. All in all, I think the gun is a bit of a novelty. A cool idea, but impractical.
            
			
									
						Oh, and six shots in a row means you need to reload the gun 6 times before you shoot it. All in all, I think the gun is a bit of a novelty. A cool idea, but impractical.
I wonder how much deeper the ocean would be without sponges.
Right now I'm having amnesia and deja vu at the same time. I think I've forgotten this before.
Add me on msn!!! insomniac-55@hotmail.com
						Right now I'm having amnesia and deja vu at the same time. I think I've forgotten this before.
Add me on msn!!! insomniac-55@hotmail.com
You're right it's probably crap anyway. I'm still kinda new and when I started I wanted everyone to tell me what to do. But once I studied and  learned how to build them, I don't want directions.
            
			
									
						" It's ok for a man to commit adultry if his wife is ugly"         Howard Stern
						





